have caused confusion and concern in supporting the view the words of Sergio Marchionne, Fiat's future scenarios: "Over the next 2 or 3 years we could try to build a only entity which could be located here in the United States. "Obviously, the hypothesis of a possible relocation of the leadership in Detroit has sparked the inevitable reaction from the world of politics and trade unions, rightly concerned by the possible departure from Turin.
Susanna Camusso, CGIL, said: "It 's time for a discussion of industrial policy, the government had to ask for guarantees to breath because we thought the operation was the transfer in the U.S.: I think that this declaration of Marchionne confirms all the concerns we had. " Equally hard Maurizio Landini, Fiom: "It is confirmed that the will of the fiat and not 'to boost production and design in our country and remains the risk that wants to leave Italy." Rocco Palombella, Uilm, assessed Marchionne's words as "wrong, inappropriate, offensive to a country that still continues to invest on the future of the Group and he does so because he believes that the thinking head of Fiat in Turin remains "
Even the political world, especially the left one has reacted angrily to the idea of \u200b\u200btransfer Detoit. Pierluigi Bersani, secretary of the Democratic Party, said: "I was minister, too. Marchionne I would call and say: After having explained how to organize shifts and breaks, will you tell us what's going on prospects with Chrysler? ". "I would not - he continued - for the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy, Turin Italy for the gift is to become the suburbs of Detroit (and this would be very severe). Because we are not at all agree. We want answers on investment. " Antonio Di Pietro, Italy of Values \u200b\u200bthe possible shift in Detroit is "a very serious operation of industrial collapse in our country. Fiat continues to live on Italian public money and financial resources, but unlike the past, is using them to move the head of the company in the U.S. and production in low cost countries. "
consequence of this, Marchionne has revealed to the bags that their words must be read as essre assumptions, "Marchionne told the sense of the assumptions made only with respect to future possible, but by no means decided, corporate structure, without any reference to it 'for now it' for tomorrow to a different location and design of the administrative functions of the company. A vague hypothesis is not a decision. But one thing is certain: all of Italy, in its institutional components as well as social consensus, has earned the right to preserve and project management functions "
As for the last words of the President of Fiat, ; Elkann to the mayor of Turin Sergio Chiamparino. The latter is then intervened in the affair by saying that, "Elkann said Fiat's strategy will be integrated with Chrysler and that there will be more business centers in areas where there is a strong market presence: one in Turin for Europe, one in Detroit for the U.S. one in Brazil and possibly one in Asia. " So in a sense, the truth lies "in the middle."
Torino Lingotto and will remain a cornerstone of the resulting equation Fiat + Chrysler. But in Detroit, most likely, have no intention of giving up the reins at Turin with respect to certain decisions. Hence the possibility of a future company with two heads. And frankly we do not know if everything is good in terms of linearity and consistency management on the other hand .... this is probably that the price of fiat had to pay to get that hoped-for integration with Chrysler likely to be a net trade surplus terms comèplessiva competitiveness: the problems to solve are still a lot of controversy and amplify the signal that is on a ground that is necessary to proceed with leaden feet .... even seemingly minor issues such as that underlying the 'seal 'business of our country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment